Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Rethinking Points For A Counter Terrorism Fiction Novel

By Ines Flores


Were there no glaring inconsistencies in the media version of events, Americans would not think what they do. If the 911 Commission Report was not more like a 911 Omission Report, Americans would not think what they do. With so many lies fired at them from a television set, the whole idea of a counter terrorism fiction novel is a bad joke.

More than half of all the citizens of the United States question the official narratives of events from Gulf of Tonkin to the more current Paris shooting. The world media claims a policeman is shot and killed even though their own footage shows the bullet going about a foot past his head and bouncing off concrete. They tried to remove the clip from public consciousness, but there are too many people out there with the Hoppa.

Still the media claims this officer is dead, so Americans are wondering who killed him and when was his time of death. The footage which was ripped from the headlines by the digital recorder of some American with a sound mind has been removed from the Net several times. People all over the world keep re-releasing it while the media claims the footage never existed.

The words countering terror have become synonymous with the double-speak outlined in the book 1984. Like the book, government goons encourage citizens to spy on one-another and watch for signs of aberrant behavior that could spell a terrorist plot. Meanwhile, the only terrorists plotting appear to be working for Mossad, MI-5, and the CIA.

Novels have been written about fancy and heroic figures who make counter terrorism a romantic notion where the United States are superheros and the rest of the world is misguided. This propaganda is intended to make young people want to join military ranks for a government that is global. It is not about the US being in control of the world, but rather, them using this country as a training ground for the police force that will do the bidding of corporations and royal families.

A clearly drugged-up young Islamic man from Africa is assisted onto a flight by an unknown man who appeared to be of Middle Eastern or Indian heritage. This Islamic man had no ticket, passport, luggage, or ID. Somehow this unidentified man takes an airport security person to the side and convinces them to let the African board a plane into the United States; all so this man can come to be known as the Underwear Bomber.

Then we have the lovely movie theater shooting where the eye-witnesses all said there was more than one shooter, but the media just ignored that. The people are to ignore the two tear gas canisters found in different parts of the theater, and two gas masks left on the sidewalk. No one will ever forget that lone gunman showing up to court with orange hair, so drugged he could not even speak.

The best clip has to come from the Sandy Hook shooting. People claiming to be parents of a slain child are seen laughing and cutting up with people from the news company just before going on live TV. The laughter stops abruptly as the whole world watches these two people go into character before announcing the death of their child. A child who, one of several killed, was reportedly clipped military style, double tap to the head, strategic hits in less than thirty seconds by a drugged young man with disabilities.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment